![]() The problem lies in that StarCraft II will only utilize two cores and as a result a Phenom II X4 965 will not be any faster than a Phenom II X2 555. However real-time strategy games are often more demanding on the CPU side and StarCraft II is no exception. Generally when testing first person shooters we find that a budget quad-core processor will deliver similar performance than a more expensive high-end model, such as the Core i7 920. ![]() When it comes to picking the right CPU for this game things become a little trickier. Therefore we can safely and happily conclude that you won't need to spend over $200 to enjoy StarCraft II in all of its glory at any resolution. This card was able to match the GeForce GTX 480 and Radeon HD 5870 graphics cards even at 2560x1600. For those better used to extreme resolutions, the newly released GeForce GTX 460 graphics card appears to be the ultimate weapon in StarCraft II. We found that even older, previous generation cards such as the GeForce GTX 260 and even the Radeon HD 4870 are good enough to tackle the most demanding aspects of this game.Īt 1920x1200 using the ultra quality settings, anything faster than the old GeForce GTX 260 is a little pointless and that's saying a lot in our opinion. Gamers have little to fear on the GPU front as this is not a game that challenges the latest graphics cards. The intention of testing 4v4 gameplay was to look for the worst case performance scenario on StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |